Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search Businesses

Web Directory

Carbon Footprint Calculator

Alltop.com Cleveland

Contact

  • TurnItUp Marketing LLC Cleveland, Ohio 44118 franpro at sbcglobal dot net

Blog/Website Disclosure

Disclaimer

  • Sometimes this blog may have Guest Authors. The opinions expressed by them are their opinions, and may or may not be ours.

Our Commitment

« Behind The Scenes On Election Eve; WKYC-TV And Meet The Bloggers | Main | COSE Is Ready To Support New President Elect »

November 05, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca59e53ef010535db6be5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WTAM 1100 Radio Needs An Attitude Adjustment! :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The Franchise King

Hi Margaret,
You are not late to this discussion. That is because nothing has changed.

Inciting hatred etc. of politicians, on either side is just not productive.

His rating are probably average, at best anyway.

He won't last.

JL

Margaret

I know I am late to this discussion. But I am increasingly disgusted with Bob Frantz and WTAM in general. I don't mind if Frantz has views different than mine, it is all in his presentation. He is hateful, inciteful and misogynistic (unless the woman in question is an evangelical right-winger like Palin). He is everything that is wrong with Cleveland radio. He was disgusting in his criticism of Hillary Clinton, deriding her looks, etc., calling her a man. Hey Bob, ever look in the mirror? You like like the man with the pitchfork with that goatee.

Thank you, Toledo, for saddling us with this jerk. I think the way to go is to barrage the advertisers with complaints. Boycott their products.

It would be nice if WTAM's lineup was more balanced. Why not have Ron Reagan's program? He is articulate, classy, and respectful, the antithesis of Bob Frantz.

Only in Cleveland would the likes of Frantz find work.

derek

Also, Anita, candidates didn't advance at the expense of women. Senator Obama ran one of the most organized campaigns in history. He stayed on message, was rarely taken off course and worked very hard to keep it about the issues. We should be proud of how he won as well as the fact that he did win.

Both Senator Clinton and Governor Palin got scrutiny that they unfairly received because they were women and that is wrong. Senator Clinton got chastised and called the b-word because of her aggressive nature while her counterparts are lauded for the same behavior. Governor Palin was often dismissed because she was considered attractive and, according to some, couldn't possible have some independent thoughts. While I don't think she was ready to be president, she wasn't the village idiot either. So, sexism was omnipresent but it wasn't why these candidates came up on the short end.

Senator Clinton lost because she took the low road against Senator Obama and the McCain / Palin ticket lost for the same reason. It is wrong of them to set her up as the goat.

Derek

Joel,

First off, always a pleasure to meet up with you again.

It's sad that they had to take the low road. I was impressed with McCain's speech. For the most part, people at the Cuy. County Dem. watch party echoed that sentiment.

The Franchise King

Thank you Ivana. Very well put.
Change.
JL

Ivana Taylor

I saw wonderfully positive aspects to BOTH candidates and I'm sure I am no alone. My sincere hope is that what some pundits say is true - that we voted, not so much for a change in party politics - but for a CHANGE in how we relate to each other. John McCain said it so beautifully - in his speech. History is history. Let's take at least a few days to celebrate.

The Franchise King

Eve,
"No You Didn't!!!!!!"
Thanx for the chime-in.
JL

Eve Lopez

Bravo on your brave words! I'm glad I didn't have to listen to any Rush Limbaugh wannabe in California. VICTORY! VICTORY! VICTORY!

The Franchise King

Anita,
Thank you for really sharing your feelings about gender. I guess I really don't think about that aspect of things. For me, whether it is a man or a woman is not the issue. It is about the quality of the person, first, for me. I am sorry you had to experience a double standard. Never would happen on my watch.
Joel Libava

Anita Campbell

Hmmm, interesting words about Governor Palin, Joel.

One thing that bugs me about this election is the blatant sexism that came out in so many ways, first targeting Senator Hillary Clinton and next again Governor Sarah Palin.

Things were said about, and done to both that would never have happened to a man.

I think it's great to be fired up over a candidate and tout how the racism barriers have been broken, but not to do so at the expense of women.

I found a lot to disagree with both women candidates on, but I felt a common bond when it came to how they were both treated, because I too have personally felt and overcome a double standard.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.